I compared the SS community data having studies away from non-input groups
Twenty communities in which SS was actually held was chosen at random away from a whole list of 2 hundred towns in which degree had occurred ranging from , we.e. 1-36 months through to the survey. Out of every one of these 20 SS towns, i selected one to earlier trainee to possess a semi-prepared, in-breadth interviews. 1 / 2 of was basically picked randomly away from a listing made by KHPT professionals men and women exactly who it teams think got gained out-of degree: the other 1 / 2 of was basically picked at random regarding the big number out-of trainees. All the picked SS trainees has also been asked to identify a relative or friend getting interviews, anyone that have whom they mutual a close matchmaking. These were maybe not told of one’s reason behind the interviews. The interviews was basically conducted in the regional vernacular because of the interviewers taught inside the partial-arranged choosing. Concerns incorporated its point of views towards SS knowledge, key training attained and datingranking.net/tr/fuck-marry-kill-inceleme you may shared, viewpoints towards individual attitudinal and you may behavioral alter, and you may viewpoints with the change attributable to SS, amongst their relatives plus the community. The IDI transcripts have been analyzed by hand having constant templates and you may information.
Polling Booth Surveys (PBS) have been used by KHPT and others to obtain information on delicate subjects such as sexual practices; the methodology has been reported elsewhere . In summary, participants are interviewed in a group, though each person is behind a polling booth-type screen. The PBS sessions were conducted by trained PBS facilitators in the local vernacular in 40 villages: 20 where SS had been conducted in 2005, and 20 where no such training had been done. First we divided each village into 6 segments and randomly assigned each segment to one of the following 6 groups (unmarried women and unmarried men, younger married women and men, older married women and men). In each segment, one house was selected at random as a “starter” house. In this home, we listed all members of the household. If any person satisfied the criteria for inclusion, we requested their participation (if there was more than one such person in the house, we selected one at random). Then working to the left, we followed the same procedure in each house until we had invited 12 people in the appropriate group, giving an approximate total invited sample of 1440 respondents in the 20 SS villages and 1440 in the 20 non-SS villages. We were able to poll 1196 respondents in SS villages (83% response) and 1297 (90% response) in other villages, with a combined sample of 2493 (87% response). In addition, as many SS trainees as possible from the 20 Stepping Stones villages, were convenience-sampled to participate in a separate PBS session. In all 414 former trainees were sampled. Questions were a mixture of ones used in previous KHPT PBS and some were taken from the GEM Scale . The questions focused on knowledge, attitude and behaviour and involved yes/no or don’t know/not applicable responses. The knowledge and attitude questions were the same for all groups, but the behaviour questions differed according to what was appropriate for the specific group. All PBS data were entered into Excel spreadsheets and differences between groups were calculated using a chi-squared test. Preliminary analysis found that the general population samples were very similar; however the SS group profile was different to that of the general population samples (p < 0.01, Table 1), so the data from the SS trainee group were adjusted directly, using the stratum-specific denominator of the SS general population group as the standard population. Differences between groups were then calculated in STATA version 10 (STATA Corporation, USA) and p values calculated using a z-test (test of equality between proportions).